Governor
Schwarzenegger should be commended for suggesting a
solution to the tough problem of covering the
uninsured. I just don't think any economic theory
supports the outcomes he desires. And I definitely
don't believe his is a "centrist" approach. A centrist
approach would be devoid of tax increases, employer
mandates and mandated spending by providers, and be full
of market based incentives to lower the cost of private
health plans.
My firm handles over $40 million in health and health
related business, so I follow health insurance and
health care trends as closely as possible. Diagnosing
the reasons for 6.5 million uninsured citizens isn't
that tough. Employer paid health plans are expensive.
Treating doctors and facilities are grossly underpaid by
government funders such as Medicare, Medicaid and
MediCal. Those un-reimbursed costs are mostly
transferred to the private health plans when they
contract for services with the health care providers.
Thus, the "hidden tax" on Californians is primarily
caused
by the government because the cost of health plans is
inflated, and out of reach to many employers, due to
government rationing of health care dollars. This cost
shifting accounts for a significant percentage of the
uninsured problem today.
The federal government also contributes to the problem
by failing to enforce employment laws and a secure
border. The "hidden tax" on us for caring for illegal
immigrant health care is a federal government problem,
and they aren't going to fix it. Illegal
immigration inflates the cost, and reduces the
availability of private health insurance, which is made
more expensive by un-reimbursed care for the illegals.
This is also the primary cause of the closure of over
sixty ER hospitals in California. The Governor’s
proposal to cover illegal immigrants is a non –
starter. Californians are solidly against it.
Finally, a significant number of uninsured are uninsured
by choice, and because they work part time. A
government mandate for employer paid insurance, as
proposed by the government, will depress wages and
available entry level jobs.
The Governor's proposal includes at least three tax
increases disguised as fees, and these increases will
never make it out of the legislature because they
require a two thirds vote. The 2% physician tax, 4%
hospital tax, and 4% "play or pay" tax on small
employers will hurt the economy and drive capital away
from the health care markets. Let's quit playing
semantics - these are taxes, and the Governor has broken
his pledge on new taxes. This issue will be litigated.
And the State will lose.
A primarily theory associated with the Governor's
proposal is that we are bringing a "hidden tax" out into
the open and funding the care of those without care
through additional "fees", employer mandates and
increased MediCal reimbursements. If these increased
funding sources, as dubious as they may seem, actually
do replace the "hidden" tax, than the cost of all
private, employer based health plans should
immediately go down,
as the costs are shifted back to the new revenue
sources. This is as likely to happen as Social Security
being solvent in 2050, and is a pipe dream and we should
not believe. The mere fact that government, already a
primary cause of the uninsured problem, proposes to
solve the problem through higher funding should scare
everyone to death. No pun intended.
Requiring health providers to spend 85% of their health
care revenue on patient care is an intrusion into
business planning and will drive capital out of the
health care industry in California and to industries
where no such mandates exist. There is no evidence that
the private health care industry is spending an
inadequate amount of its resources on patient care -
providers have already had to adjust to a lean revenue
environment. This is quietly one of the more outrageous
provisions of the Governor's proposal. There should be
no directive from a State that cannot handle its own
finances to an industry that produces, annually, more
advancement and innovation and productivity in one year
than the government does in ten years. Regulating
profits = regulating innovation, research, and the
availability of care. Profits are essential to a
thriving health care marketplace.
Fast forward to a scenario where the Governor's plan
actually works, and there is no damage to the economy,
and we have 6.5 million more citizens with health
insurance. The
health system would simply collapse.
There are not nearly enough nurses, physicians,
specialists and facilities to treat millions more users
of health insurance in California. Health care would
immediately become more rationed than it already is, and
then what would happen? A parallel example: put 6
million more cars on the road tomorrow and see what
happens. Chaos.
So what
steps should be taken now to make health insurance more
accessible and affordable? Here are a few ideas:
1. Put the new money on the table first.
Increase reimbursement rates for government run
health plans first. Cost shifting to private plans will
end and health insurance rates paid by employers and
employees should come down. When rates come down,
access to plans goes up. Employer profits and
associated income taxes increase - helping to fund the
increased reimbursement rates. How many more people
will be insured by their employer once this change
occurs? Probably tens of thousands.
2. Make the uninsured pay something.
Someone has to say it. I will. Most of the
uninsured are not destitute. They wait in line all
night to get Play Station 3, they send their money back
to Mexico, they eat out, they have TV's, they go to
County Fairs, they see movies, they go to concerts, they
own cell phones - they live life. When they go to the
ER they plead poverty. There, I said it. Collect
something, anything from them! ER utilization rates
will plummet if people know they have to pay - and many
will pay if asked. We just don't ask.
3. Bring the programs to the people.
How many of the 6.5 million uninsured are eligible
for MediCal or MediCaid, or Healthy families? We don't
know. We can guess, but we don't know. Put several
kiosks in every Emergency Room in the State where those
seeking care, but without insurance, can input their
information to determine eligibility and even enroll,
right then and there, in the appropriate program.
Establish a 24 call center to handle the enrollments, in
English and Spanish, so that by the time the patient is
seen, often after a several hour wait, they will have
insurance. This could virtually eliminate un-reimbursed
care in the State and give the patient something to do
while they are waiting. There are already websites in
place to help people research their options.
www.coverageforall.org is one such website.
4. Fund this new effort by taking a new look at
education spending.
Everything cannot be a priority, so let's decide
what the priorities are. We've more than doubled
education spending in California since 1996 and
enrollment is up less than 15%. Birthrates are at all
time lows and enrollment trends are stagnant. Why, oh
why, do we keep throwing money into this bucket when the
true cost drivers, kids, are not increasing in any way
commensurately with the increased spending? To fund the
increased reimbursements for State funded health care,
we are going to have to shift money away from other
programs. Education should be number one on the list.
These
four ideas should be put into practice before any
sweeping employer mandates or taxes are brought to a
vote. Let's be entrepreneurial first and see if we can
solve the uninsured problem with capitalism, not
socialism.